Filed under: TV & Video, distribution, peer-to-peer | Tags: distribution, Miro, openaccess, opensource, openstandards, peertopeer, RSS, TV, video
Miro is a brilliant idea, a free, all-in-one, opensource desktop video application that plays almost any file format and allows you to search and download videos from pretty much anywhere. How good is that!
But, yet again, I’d never heard of it before Re:publica08 last week. I’m starting to think this may beacome a bit of a repetitive theme. To be clear, I agree with the principles behind it, openaccess, openstandards, opensource. To quote their site:
“With the decentralized structure of the internet, there is no reason to have gatekeepers that limit who gets to show their videos to the world. Miro is built to connect with any online publisher that has video RSS feeds, whether they are individuals or video hosting companies.”
https://www.getmiro.com/about/mission/
But I’m not sure (a) who it’s for, or (b) who’s using it. It seems to be yet another product built on good intentions and a lot of assumptions.
The company behind it the Participatory Culture Foundation is proud of its non-profit status and its mission to create tools for broader, deeper engagement with culture and politics. Being non-profit means that the employees are signed up to ‘the Miro cause’ and that the company is more accountable to its user community and the public. All well and good, but to me it seems that the cause is more important than producing a product that people want/need.
If you’re young and techy, or even just a bit techy, you’ve probably got your peer-to-peer software of choice installed and configured exactly as you want it. You’ll also know all of your favourite video sites and probably have RSS feeds configured to tell you about all the new content. If you’re older then TV/video probably means entertainment to you. You probably don’t want to fuss about with an application like Miro, and you probabaly want something that provides more of a TV experience, e.g. Joost or iPlayer (not that either are in any way perfect).
I’ve also yet to see anyone outside of the usual slashdot, boingboing, techradar websites discussing the product. Any product needs to be sustainable in the long term to support the company, that develops it, charitable or not. Where’s the publicity mission? The current mission is far too technical and idealistic; how are they going to get it out there? However much you dislike the big corporates of the world, they do know that sales (or in this case give aways) are ultimately what counts.
PS If someone from Miro can prove me wrong I’d be glad to hear from them. Although ultimately only time, uptake, and the company’s survival will tell us.
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: charity, citizen, community, internet, mySociety, re:publica08, voluntary
Tom Steinberg from mySociety was speaking at Re:publica08 last week; he was one of the most inspiring speakers I’ve seen. To quote from the website:
mySociety has two missions. The first is to be a charitable project which builds websites that give people simple, tangible benefits in the civic and community aspects of their lives. The second is to teach the public and voluntary sectors, through demonstration, how to most efficiently use the internet to improve lives.
I think that they’re delivering on the first of these missions, but I’m not sure how well they’re performing on the second (more on this below).
To give you an idea of what they do, here are some of the sites that they’ve built and currently run. All are UK services with the exception of GroupsNearYou:
- TheyWorkForYou: a searchable, annotatable version of Parliamentary debates and committees, as well as useful pages providing clear, non-biased information on a range of different measures of activities by MPs.
- WriteToThem: a site that puts you in contact with any of your elected representatives (Councillors, MP, MEPs, MSPs, etc). You enter a single postcode and it tells you who all your local representatives are, and who you should contact for which reasons.
- FixMyStreet: a site where people can report, view, or discuss local problems like graffiti, fly tipping, broken paving slabs, or street lighting. Problems are reported to the relevant council which can then resolve the problem the way they normally would. The problem remains public so users of the site can discuss it with others, and if they chose to, lobby the council to fix it, or fix it directly themsleves.
- GroupsNearYou: allows users to search for and add local groups of all kinds, from farmers’ markets to political activists.
One of the best things about these sites, particularly FixMyStreet and WriteToThem, is their simplicity. A first time web user would find them intuitive. So often those of us that work in media forget that there are still a large number of people for whom the internet remains a new and challenging place. The UK National Statistics office figures show that in 2007, only 61% of houses had access to the internet (the figures).
Another great thing, and one that Tom was very keen to stress, is that these sites invite people to get involved by helping them solve a problem. So often we hear from people who’ve built the next great thing, and ‘if only they could just persuade people that it was what they really needed’ then it would take off (more of this in other posts about the Re:publica conference). The fact that mySociety is (re)engaging citizens on their own terms, in their own communities, is a wonderful achievement.
So all of this is great. But now comes the ‘but’. I’d never heard of any of these sites. Why? They’re great, they’re serving a definite purpose, and they seem to have won awards. A quick straw poll of friends and family shows that none of them had heard of them either. Tom himself seemed to provide the answer at the workshop I attended. When asked whether they have publicity, or work with schools, councils, libraries, etc he was quick to point out that they’re charitable and largely run by volunteers. Why is it that numerous techheads are happy to develop new websites for nothing, but they can’t find people who want to get their hands dirty promoting and publicising? Are they talking to the right people? Tom seems to speak at a lot of conferences about the technical side and citizenship; perhaps if he or others talked to teachers, librarians and council workers, more volunteers would be forthcoming.
I’d also like to know how successful these sites are. I couldn’t find any research on The mySociety website; there’s some data on the individual sites, but it’s largely to do with whether users have had responses. I want to know how many individual users there are, how often they use the sites, what the model of growth has been; only then will I really know whether they’re worth the time and money invested. I sense that Tom would argue that if they’ve persuaded even one person to be become more involved, then they’re worth it, but I’m not yet 100% convinced.
Having said all of this I have told a lot of people about the sites, and that in itself tells you something.
Filed under: Uncategorized
Me
I AM NOT A TECHY. That’s the most important thing I need to say; if anyone thinks what I’m writing is getting too technical please, please let me know. I’ve worked in new media for a long time, for start-ups and for major corporations and I hope that my experiece will allow me to bring something new to the debate.
The Blog: From the other side
My aim with this blog is to air some of the discussions being talked about in the web world to the mass audience (whether that audience is interested is another matter – of which more later). I hope that some of the netizens, activists and others (re)presenting the new world will read this too, in my experience they’re often too wrapped up in their own opinions/arguments to listen, so if this challenges them even a little I’ll be pleased.
It’s called “From the other side” because:
(a) I needed something that conveyed the fact that I had worked for “the other side”
(b) I want to present the “other side” of the argument
(c) It’s really hard to think of Blog names that haven’t already been taken
Finally, an attribution, the image used is from Flickr under a Creative Commons licence. Thank’s Skazama. http://www.flickr.com/photos/skazama/66498449/